InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

blinkeedotcom

03/28/17 2:54 PM

#146697 RE: WBCTrader #146694

Hey, I bet you never would guess a small company like Blinkee.com, LLC did business with NASA in the past.

We did have to register with DUNS, but I bet STI is already registered with them.

That was really the only hoop we had to jump through.

NASA did give us a 100+ page questionnaire, detailing our activities in the aerospace industry, but we found out we were exempt from completing that since we were just a novelty company.

Here is the blinkee pin we made for them for their public outreach campaign in schools:
http://logoblinkee.com/portfolio/items/nasa-custom-blinkee-light-lapel-pin/

So you see working with the government isn't quite as hard as you are making it out to be.

Besides, as was brought out on this board earlier today, SFOR's ACS has been working with DOD for 25 years or so.
icon url

4sleddogs

03/28/17 2:55 PM

#146698 RE: WBCTrader #146694

No kidding! "SFOR can not be in the running for a Government contract, not possible" ACS is the fully vetted DOD vendor that has had a relationship with DOD for 25 years. ACS is SFOR's Government Agency vendor. ACS was the one who presented to the DOD/CIO. If chosen, the contract to provide Mobile Trust would be cut to ACS and SFOR would get a % as stipulated in the contract with ACS.
ACS has no IT product of it's own, they are a middle man vendor.
icon url

NCAR

03/28/17 2:57 PM

#146700 RE: WBCTrader #146694

You mean like that four pronged strategy? Law suits, tv commercial, etc........ None of which ever happens! Sure a few more people getting sued but revenue is still in the stinker! How do I know? Kay is not opening his mouth about any of it! He is letting speculation run wild as he dilutes. Maybe he will do another video when he's done diluting, you know to dampen enthusiasm!
icon url

4sleddogs

03/28/17 5:16 PM

#146797 RE: WBCTrader #146694

You honestly think "expired credentials" would stand in the way of DOD procurement? I did a tour of duty in the Pentagon. I've seen regulations waived to get something deemed mission essential. Let's see, BBC reported that EUCOM Lt/Gen Ben Hodges' troops were cyber attacked by the Russians as they deployed in E. Europe last month.
He complained about this vulnerability in AFN News way back in June. The DOD/CIO policy guy assured me they were aware of the problem and working the issue. IF and that's a big IF DISA selected Mobile Trust, version 3 as the solution to the military issue I-Phone COMSEC problem do you believe paperwork would not be swiftly put in order to enable purchase? When it comes to items deemed mission essential the operators call the shots not the bureaucrats!
icon url

skydog526

03/29/17 12:52 PM

#147127 RE: WBCTrader #146694

This should be stickied if verified by mod
icon url

AZresident

03/29/17 1:56 PM

#147158 RE: WBCTrader #146694

For what it's worth, Advanced Cyber Security (this is the ACS everyone's talking about, right? https://www.advancedcybersecurity.com/index.html ) doesn't come up on the SAM site either.
There's an Advanced Cyber Security Center in progress, but that company doesn't appear to be the same.
https://www.acscenter.org/about/contact.html