InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 8
Posts 4298
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 04/14/2016

Re: 4sleddogs post# 146666

Tuesday, 03/28/2017 2:42:58 PM

Tuesday, March 28, 2017 2:42:58 PM

Post# of 235076
Let us know if there is any news from SFOR about anything actually coming to fruition from all of your efforts.
I would hate to think all of that work was in vain.

Has mark stated that they have in fact obtained their Qualification and listing in a QPL, QML, or QBL, because without it, they can't even be concidered for a DOD contract as referenced in subpart 9.2 Qualification Requirements.

Strikeforce would also need to register their business to do business with the US Government and Obtain a Data Universal Numbering System (DUNS) Number and register in the
System for Award Management (SAM)as referenced in this Doing Business With the DOD

A quick search for strikeforce technologies on the Goverment SAM website turns up nothing on strikeforce. (I bet mark kay is working on this as we speak, right?) EDIT as of 10/7/2010 their DUNS # is expired.

Sadly tho, until those requirements are met, which if you read the referenced material will include a "vendor supply chain risk assessment"

SFOR CAN NOT BE IN THE RUNNING FOR A DOD CONTRACT, NOT POSSIBLE. THEIR CREDENTIALS ARE EXPIRED


EVEN IF ACS IS A DOD VENDOR, THEY COULD NOT USE A SFOR PRODUCT NOT POSSIBLE IN BLACK AND WHITE GOVERNMENT DOCS RIGHT THERE