News Focus
News Focus
icon url

DewDiligence

03/08/17 7:46 PM

#209719 RE: DewDiligence #209680

RVNC—Does anyone agree/disagree with this?
icon url

randychub

03/09/17 9:42 AM

#209732 RE: DewDiligence #209680

Do you think the health concerns with Botox are such that a better purity will matter?
icon url

DewDiligence

03/14/17 3:45 PM

#209866 RE: DewDiligence #209680

Nice job by RVNC CEO, Dan Browne at Barclays today; from #msg-129290320:

...RT002 is a more modern and much purer product than Botox. Specifically, RT002 has no animal-derived ingredients and no excipients other than the proprietary peptide (for reduced diffusion from the injection site). Botox, on the other hand, uses human albumin and other stabilizing proteins in its formulation, which has remained essentially unchanged since the 1980s.

Browne remembered to stress this point on today's webcast.
icon url

DewDiligence

03/15/17 11:27 AM

#209886 RE: DewDiligence #209680

RVNC establishes a second source for fill/finish:

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1479290/000147929017000017/rvnc8k31417.htm

RVNC remains in full control of the botulinum-toxin API.

See #msg-119792085 for related info.
icon url

marthambles

03/15/17 11:30 AM

#209887 RE: DewDiligence #209680

Dew. Do you have any specific citation referencing and delineating the differences in purity between RT002 and Botox? Thanks