News Focus
News Focus
icon url

RCChristian

02/04/17 7:25 PM

#384303 RE: rekcusdo #384299


The substance of your post is "The original conservatorship won't be questioned (my accounting vs.yours), but the NWS seems illegal, and if any of it can be proven in court you better believe they may take people to court. "

This I fully agree with. The NWS is a clear breach of contract. I hope the courts agree.


I agree.
icon url

SoFOR

02/04/17 7:58 PM

#384313 RE: rekcusdo #384299

First I'd say that I don't like the term propaganda being applied. I don't think any of my opinion could be anything other than an opinion. I am not seeking to spin any information of a biased or misleading nature, to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.

On the contrary I'm simply stating what I see as likely possibilities. There are a lot of moving parts (personalities and standards), and so random as my thoughts might be construed it is only because I'm trying to piece together random pieces of this puzzle. I post simply because I'm curious to know what others are seeing that I'm not, a validation of my view, or for opposing views to my own. IHub is great for exactly that.

All this being said, it would appear there is consensus on a few things. Intentions of authority figures might be speculative, but from what I've seen Presidents and congressmen are human. Their actions and information suggests that the motivation for much of what's happened in the past two weeks has been a pre-meditated removal of Obama's legacy. I would not be surprised if this were to culminate in litigation for perceived criminal acts.