p.s. ABBV still holds the FDA priority review-voucher purchased from UTHR for $350M in 2015 (#msg-116321586). (The voucher wasn't needed for FDA review of G/P because G/P had already been granted BTD.)
"A Priority Review designation means FDA’s goal is to take action on an application within 6 months (compared to 10 months under standard review)." (also...) "FDA informs the applicant of a Priority Review designation within 60 days of the receipt of the original BLA, NDA, or efficacy supplement."
So I guess I was thinking that the 6 months would go back to the December 19, 2016 Abbvie NDA.
Likewise.... since for G-1 they were already getting a speedier evaluation, wouldn't that suggest for G-1 a june approval? Is it possible the other genotypes could be approved on the same timeline now as G-1 for G/P?
When rubber stamped by the European Commission in a few months, the CHMP’s label expansion for Viekirax/Exviera should increase ABBV/ENTA’s market share in the EU, which is a predominantly GT1b market where Viekirax/Exviera already has a market share in the mid twenties (#msg-128526031).
However, the sales uplift for ABBV/ENTA from having an 8-week option for Viekirax/Exviera will be relatively short-lived insofar as ABBV/ENTA’s pan-genotypic G/P will be on the market in many EU countries within the next year or so (#msg-127281791), cannibalizing sales of Viekirax/Exviera.