News Focus
News Focus
icon url

stoneroad

01/30/17 11:17 AM

#284775 RE: asmarterwookie #284757

Well that's a bummer. Perhaps that's why no PR.
icon url

golfho

01/30/17 11:39 AM

#284777 RE: asmarterwookie #284757

Hi Wook…

WRT your friend's statement and the possible miss-understanding.

“If this group really had a 100% accurate, inexpensive, non-invasive, biomarker test for ovarian cancer it would have been much bigger news.”



What this abstract presented was a “Proof of Concept” based on a small test that had very interesting numbers, NOT a definitive verification.

What management stated several times was that they were going to develop a “Proof of Concept” and then start negotiations to partner and develop the technology.

I wrote in my last post:

“It was and still is clear to me that the timeline will run something like:
6 to 8 months? to “develop, optimize and validate a functional assay”
After that any potential partner would need to test and verify the assay.
2 to 4 month? For that effort…
That brings us to around March to July for final negotiations to occur.”



I’ve revised my timetable.

We now know that the “Proof of Concept” is complete and intense negotiation are most likely occurring as we speak. Hence the bizarre CC and the thundering silence.

Will they be able to save the bacon by 3-24-17…?

I hope so.

Regards
golfho
icon url

corporalagarn

01/30/17 12:54 PM

#284794 RE: asmarterwookie #284757

"exosomes are a hot topic now"

I think this is the key phrase from Wook's buddy. PPHM loves to jump on the flavor of the day.

When the bird flu was hot, Bavi cured that.

When Zika was hot, Bavi cured that.

When West Nile was hot, Bavi cured that.

When the swine flu was hot, Bavi cured that.

Jump on board.