News Focus
News Focus
icon url

arvitar

12/27/16 1:52 PM

#128385 RE: KMBJN #128382

What is the evidence that multiple labs have been able to replicate anything on samples that Seymour has sent to them?
icon url

Rawnoc

12/27/16 1:59 PM

#128387 RE: KMBJN #128382

Wouldn't it be great if Seymour communicated the #1 show stopper for NeverCides instead of speculating on IHUB?

Seymour had 6 months to write his CEO letter and held an annual shareholder meeting and not once did he address in any meaningful capacity the greatest holdup in 12 years.

Every batch of meaningful size has been inconsistent from previous batches. It doesn't matter if the results are 100% the same if the batches (and therefore drugs) aren't consistent. NeverCides's own SEC filings warn of this. Hence TOX testing has been dead in the water for years no matter how big the inconsistent batches are created -- they are worthless unless consistent.

Maybe it's time to persuade Seymour to issue a lying PR and claim they can make batches consistently and start TOX. It's not like Seymour has a problem with begin dishonest. Just as one of the largest shareholders -- "Dave" -- from the AGM.
icon url

Nanotoday

12/27/16 3:01 PM

#128401 RE: KMBJN #128382

Are you saying every test that has been done has been sent from one batch?


Every test for a specific 'cide has been from a batch for that treatment. Not a single batch, but a batch for HIV, or a batch for Flu...but never have 2 batches been replicated...never.

You ask us why but don't bother to ask management.

Typical.