News Focus
News Focus
icon url

Its_lose_not_loose

12/13/16 4:18 PM

#127956 RE: KMBJN #127954

Diwan pulled the usual "I have permission to lie" because of the forward-looking statement.

Sad thing is he wasn't joking.
icon url

Its_lose_not_loose

12/13/16 4:20 PM

#127958 RE: KMBJN #127954

Did you hear the anger and frustration in the shareholders' voices, those that asked questions?

It was unmistakable.
icon url

arvitar

12/13/16 4:22 PM

#127959 RE: KMBJN #127954

One doesn't have to "hear it" for it to be a material event.

The fact that Seymour is seriously considering a cockamamy Geriatric Warrant Scheme, and is a delusional tired old fossil who lost his mojo, is glaringly evident from what he said and didn't say at the meeting, when considered in its entirety.

That his highly material. Only someone who knew about the link to the actual meeting, or about the existence of the audio on a non-company message board, would be informed about it.

Ergo, the majority of investors and the investing public are not informed about how miserably Seymour performed at a gut-wrenchingly piss-poor Annual Meeting.
icon url

Nanotoday

12/13/16 5:44 PM

#127966 RE: KMBJN #127954

I listened to the meeting again and what is very disturbing is how he justifies charging NNVC (though he never mentions the cost +30%) by saying:

"many such arrangements have milestone payments, royalty payments..., but we decided not to do that, i'm just covering my butt, i don't want to take losses for work being done for NNVC"

Covering costs is covering your butt. Taking a 30% mark up is using it as an ATM.