Interesting - this assessment of the situation makes me even more interested in seeing the company explore this as an option.
If those who generally are negative on the company think it is foolish - but a shareholder for whom I have some measure of respect thinks it is a good idea - it means that I need to look into the idea in more detail for myself.
Why should anybody believe this senile fossil who is too much of a coward to reveal himself despite revealing the supposed institution he suckered in?
Besides - he did "reveal himself" quite openly and at the shareholders' meeting - so I don't think that least point of criticism holds much merit.
I kind of like the idea after a bit of initial digging - admittedly need to do some follow-ups on it though over the next few weeks.