Good point and especially the fact about he would not have known election results on the filing. A portfolio like Roche Enterprises should have been diversified to shield itself from any politics. They just did have a track record of supporting democrats. Beyond that it is all speculation. Theresa Roche up in Chicago is responsible for Roche Enterprises investments in companies like RVUE. Ultimately the value of RVUE common stock would fall on her more so than the CEO. Thats is why he could have been removable in the RVUE equation but logic suggests that would have already happened IF the last press release was accurate in terms of can not afford. Or to be specific "cutting the cost of being fully SEC reporting".
I still say they could throw the CEO under a bus but I think Robert hand picked this guy for the job. Or at least I hope so.........
If I had invested like Roche and the CEO dropped the ball this year like this?? The CEO would be terminated for good cause and that last press release would have never happened. I will drop the conversation on the RVUE CEO after this post. Unless, I get a picture of the RVUE CEO looking really dumb at the unemployment office before Roche makes his moves publicly.
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
