Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
AI Subscribe Login/Register account icon
S&P 500
7,391.45
(
-0.13%
)
US TECH 100
28,350.00
(
0.21%
)
Dow Jones
49,537.42
(
-0.45%
)
Brent Oil
105.36
(
-0.38%
)
Bitcoin
79,636.59
(
-1.06%
)
News Focus
News Focus

Replies to post #279764 on Avid Bioservices Inc (CDMO)

Replies to #279764 on Avid Bioservices Inc (CDMO)
icon url

north40000

11/29/16 9:36 AM

#279765 RE: cheynew #279764

I have wondered about that since ruling was made by C. D. Cal. judge. An early amendment to complaint would have sufficed to correlate pleadings with discovery.
icon url

patientlywaiting

11/29/16 10:18 AM

#279769 RE: cheynew #279764

Skeletons in too many closets!
icon url

InternetForumUser

11/29/16 10:30 AM

#279772 RE: cheynew #279764

Peregrine did hire the Best Lawyers in the Universe; therefore, if there was a mistake, I am fairly certain that the pleading was "Sabotaged". That is the only explanation which makes sense.

Maybe JB moonlights as a lawyer when she is not "sabotaging" Clinical Trials.

It is amazing how anything that can go wrong goes wrong with Peregrine Pharmaceuticals. It is also even more amazing that Peregrine Management is never at fault or responsible for any of the stumbles, faults and or issues.