Good post, very informative. I used my allotment of one sticky post on this so that board members can read this article in entirety. One thing though, I don't agree with the writer that Hillary was the banker's apparent choice for the prez. Logic would dictate that the banksters would have both a republican and democratic "choice". They accomplished having "their man/woman" in position to win, long before the election. In true bankster fashion they hedged their choice, and made the people's choice for the presidency a moot subject.
S~P