For the above reasons, we determine that the information presented establishes a reasonable likelihood that Petitioner would prevail in showing that claims 1, 7, 27, 28, 34, 54, 72–74, 92, 93, and 111 are (i) unpatentable under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as obvious over Chu ’684 and Chu ’366, and (ii) unpatentable under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as obvious over Chu ’684 and Chen.
Those are all the claims VPLM is relying on for its infringement argument. Being left with gutted, worthless patents is a very real, even likely, possibility now it seems. Good luck raising cash to fight for the next year too and keeping the PPS at .05