News Focus
News Focus
icon url

BullNBear52

10/18/16 6:47 PM

#258385 RE: BullNBear52 #258370

Wikileaks latest dump.

WIKILEAKS: Podesta Mocks Sanders As A ‘Doofus’

Hillary Clinton campaign Chairman John Podesta called Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders a “doofus” in an email of his that wound up on WikiLeaks as a result of a hack of his online communications.

According to an email with the subject header “Congratulations on Paris” started by Clinton 2008 campaign adviser and Center for American Progress President Neera Tanden on December 13, 2015, Podesta took a shot at Sanders.

“I know it wouldn’t have happened w o the china deal. My children and their future children thank you,” Tanden wrote to Podesta in reference to the United Nations Climate Change Conference in Paris where a climate change agreement among 195 nations had just taken place a day earlier.

Podesta replied, “Thanks Neera. Can you believe that doofus Bernie attacked it?


Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2016/10/18/wikileaks-podesta-mocks-sanders-as-a-doofus/#ixzz4NTnN6gjY
icon url

fuagf

10/18/16 7:42 PM

#258389 RE: BullNBear52 #258370

Agree you didn't, i simply just expanded on your notion that private communication was always to be seen as something that should never be made public .. sorry, but i thought mine was obvious in that, yet i still did take care back then to mention there was nothing personal meant in mine, at all .. note now, also, that i had had not commented before on whether i personally saw anything in them which could have been seen to be in the public interest, but did say that different people had differing opinions on that ..

When Is it Ethical to Publish Stolen Data?
From the Pentagon Papers to Hollywood e-mails, reporters and editors face complex decisions when it comes to reporting on information from hackers and leakers
https://www.google.com.au/search?q=juv+v+lyo+champion+league&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&client=firefox-b&gfe_rd=cr&ei=5n0GWJ7pM8Tr8AfYzLLQDg

in that article, which you might like to read again to be certain about that .. repeat, there was no intent to provoke, nor offend, at all .. i thought the article added to info around the conversation, is all ..