Replies to post #258278 on Tornado Alley (PROG)

[fuagf]

BullNBear52, if i felt your pm comment was highly slanderous of F6, and that you could be maliciously saying the same thing to others in a concerted attempt to unfairly tarnish his reputation, or the reputation of anyone else, then i myself could make a personal decision to post it publicly to expose your behavior. Lol, then, of course, i would have to bear the consequence of breaking iHub rules, yet if i felt you were acting unethically then i could decide myself that a public post would be the only ethical position for me to take. Note, without meaning to offend you at all, imo you do tend to be be a bit black and white on things at times.

That personal you introduced aside, on seeing yours in my mailbox and before opening it, i googled the subject .. this one ..

When Is it Ethical to Publish Stolen Data?
From the Pentagon Papers to Hollywood e-mails, reporters and editors face complex decisions when it comes to reporting on information from hackers and leakers
https://www.google.com.au/search?q=juv+v+lyo+champion+league&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&client=firefox-b&gfe_rd=cr&ei=5n0GWJ7pM8Tr8AfYzLLQDg

i think clearly reflects that my hunch about a 'public interest' consideration in any decision making
process to make public either hacked or leaked material, emails or not, was pretty well on the mark.

Noted of course as expected in the article depending on the material there are different opinions on how specific stolen material could be and/or should be dealt with.