News Focus
News Focus
icon url

3antar

10/14/16 4:05 PM

#356378 RE: ZZ Fannie #356376

100% agree, the writing on the wall are very crisp..
icon url

Patswil

10/14/16 4:05 PM

#356379 RE: ZZ Fannie #356376

When do you think there will be a settlement talks?
icon url

cincy45069

10/14/16 5:37 PM

#356383 RE: ZZ Fannie #356376

Sweeny wants no part of this case .Never has, never will .A No win situation for her .She's damn if she does, damn if she doesn't. She is not going to bite the hand that feeds her(GOV). Sweeny is hoping for a way she may bow out gracefully with out being made a fool of herself .
icon url

Dude22

10/14/16 6:16 PM

#356390 RE: ZZ Fannie #356376

I disagree.... if Hillary wins. No settlement. She will keep stealing just because she can.
icon url

IL Padrino

10/14/16 11:52 PM

#356417 RE: ZZ Fannie #356376

You posts are full of gross assumption, imagination, and projecting. This is so ridiculous, trying to explain the fallacies to you would be pointless

Sweeney doesn't want to be the one responsible for the election of Trump. The Government documents (59) and (11,000 plus) are damning and show them being caught red handed stealing from shareholders (citizens) and not honoring our amendments. Why would Sweeney rule now? This is how scared most people are about having Donald Trump as President. Women are coming out of the wood work yesterday and today about his behavior towards them because during the 2nd debate, Anderson Cooper asked Trump if he ever acted on his "locker room banter" (on a bus during a work interview) about sexually assaulting women... Trump said flat out....NO.

As frustrated as Sweeney is with the Government, she gave this extension for 2 reasons:

1. She doesn't want to sway the election

2. There WILL be settlement talks