entdoc, FYI the % of res-ponders is higher then 50%. For exact # see upcoming presentation.
That is if you means % of people for which the biomarkers foretold the same outcome as the measurable results in the traditional way.
And another interesting thing is that, according the info that I could gather on the topic, there are no false positives in the set. In other words, the biomarker presence has never contradicted the real results.
That is if the info is correct but I think it is because the stat. sig. stuff was too.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
AI
