I think this is a BAD proposal because I believe Zagammi and Rosen are essentially "partners in crime" in a very lucrative business and whatever financial losses they suffer as a result of this case will be written-off as the cost of doing business.
The Law provides sanctions as a means of deterring the type of behavior displayed by Rosen in this case and I don't think a proposal that essentially calls for a client to betray their "partner" and legal representative has little, if any, chance for success.
The successful disbarment of a Rosen attorney does nothing for CTIX's bottom-line. IMO, CTIX should be concerned with trying to hit Rosen as hard as possible in the place that really hurts---their wallet. This is not only the best deterrence, but it would also gives a much needed boost to CTIX's income statement. Hopefully, Sullivan will seriously drive-up Rosen's cost of doing business.
Message in reply to:
How about this as a proposal, Sullivan offers a deal of no sanctions to Zangammi(I think that was the "shareholders" name) in return Zangammi tells the truth about his involvement with Rosen. At this point I am not worried about the money but I would like to see Kim if not Rosen disbarred. My opinion from a 3 yr shareholder/wall flower on this site.
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
