I don't understand your answer to my question, but since it was rhetorical and not directed at anyone, I didn't expect one.
I still would like you to explain the difference between "hard" and "soft" assets that I posed to you earlier.
Apparently the $24M+ of assets on the balance sheet aren't meaningful because you say they are "soft" assets. Can you please expand on this and explain why? I don't understand the difference between a "hard asset" (apparently worthy) and a "soft" asset (according to you, a booked asset with no value).