News Focus
News Focus
icon url

MinnieM

07/27/16 6:47 PM

#2174 RE: mtg220022 #2173

A number of gross mistakes in this filing by Drose. What a bumbling attorney he hired. And, he obviously didn't proof it before he allowed it to be filed. Both the attorney and Drose should have caught these mistakes.


Drose response:
20. The allegations of paragraph 20 are denied. Defendant Drose did not draft the blog.

to Honig:
20. On information and belief, Does 1-10 encouraged Defendant Drose to
draft and publish the Article, and they assisted him with the drafting and
publishing process.


Did he mean to say he drafted it on his own? Or, did he just admit to collaborators?

**********

Drose attorney appears to have the attorneys listed incorrectly on the bottom. Crazy mistake right off the bat.


Drose is the defendent... and this is his attorney:
Jerry L. Sims GA Bar No. 648400
Attorney for Plaintiff

The following are actually attorneys for the plaintiff Honig:
"CM/ECF system, which will automatically send email notification of such filing to the attorneys of record for Defendants:"

Christopher Campbell
DLA PIPER LLP (US)
One Atlantic Center
1201 West Peachtree Street, Suite 2800
Atlanta, Georgia 30309-3450

Perrie M. Weiner
Robert D. Weber
DLA PIPER LLP (US)
2000 Avenue of the Stars
Suite 400 North Tower
Los Angeles, CA 90067-4704

Charles J. Harder
HARDER MIRELL & ABRAMS LLP
132 S. Rodeo Dr. Suite 301
Beverly Hills, CA 90212

Court docket clearly shows attorneys for those wondering: http://ia801502.us.archive.org/28/items/gov.uscourts.gand.228797/gov.uscourts.gand.228797.docket.html


**********

Anyway, its between Honig and Drose... I won't be posting about it here any further.












icon url

loanranger

07/29/16 3:30 PM

#2194 RE: mtg220022 #2173

"The allegations of paragraph 30 are admitted, but Defendant Drose shows
that the retraction was drafted primarily
by Charles J. Harder, one of Plaintiff’s
attorneys, and was posted by Defendant Drose
in the belief that the Plaintiff would drop his claims. Defendant Drose was told by Mr. Harder
that once the Blog was deleted, the retraction posted, and “the editors send out alerts to all
Seeking Alpha followers of Pershing Gold, ChromaDex, Barry Honig, and all of its PRO subscribers, then yes, the demands for retraction and apology will be fulfilled and
we will be finished with this process.”

This Drose guy is very sharp for his age, unless he took a verbal representation by the opposing side's attorney without running a recording.
Either 1)he did that and he's truly dopey, 2)he has a recording (that would likely get Honig to drop the case) or 3)he's making it up.