Replies to post #1813 on Fuel Cell Energy

[phtephen]

I appreciate and commend your response. You make a valid point and your knowledge of dd on the company shows you've done your homework. But you also aren't one that is on either of these boards, on a daily basis, continuing to point out deficiencies within the pr's and other releases. You got in, got out and got done.
I was specifically asking tide what his reasoning was for continuing to stick around, do homework, read pr's and attempt to point out negatives. Seems to me all that time spent on dd is possibly wasted when using it on a company he has no interest in, right? According to him he was "out months ago". Why not use that time on a new project? Possibly tide is just a very generous person and likes to look out for individuals he doesn't know? Or... there's always that little thing called paid bashing, which we all know to be illegal. I couldn't imagine someone with the investing knowledge of tide would partake in such. So, I must conclude that in reality tide is just very generous. Thanks to him for keeping us uninformed investors, informed. #sarcasmd.

[phtephen]

Secondly, in an extended reply to your post on the other board of which in limited, a successful deployment of a non-revenue producing Rubicon unit would be the final step in validating a successful working product by the company. Thus enticing anything from outside investment backing to approval of loans and institutional backing thus solving the current liquidity issue everyone continues to point out. We must continue to understand that we are talking about an exploration stage sub-penny that is attempting to establish itself in a competitive global market. The deployment of even 1 single functioning unit would be absolutely groundbreaking. Not sure how that could be so tough to understand. Longs do understand this and this is why we chose to take the risk on the potential of this coming to fruition.