No, It means they didn't want to see Neil go to jail. You can't consent after an illegal deed is done and make it legal. If Harold had agreed before hand he would have signed a power of attorney, IMO.
Wrong. Harold's consent was not required in writing to make it legal. Please check out the definition of "ratification" if you dont believe consent can be given after the fact. Although you have no evidence. And if it was illegal, why didn't Gouge object? Was he incompetent?
What I find funny is the claim that Harold didn't want to proceed but agreed to so Neil wouldn't go to jail. Except only Harold had standing to complain and put Neil in jail. spencer had no standing to do so.
It's hilarious that some believe that conduct which occurred EIGHT years ago and was never objected to will now be the basis for a remedy for spencer. Not even his former lawyers believe that.
If you want to talk about fraud, there's a list with spencer's name on it. Let's start with elaine's sworn statement to the court that Mrs. Wallace was the legal owner and spencer's ownership had been canceled. And thereafter, spencer files a quarterly report stating he is the owner. (He then filed a subsequent one with a footnote). and how about his fraudulent claim of receiving $750,000 in revenue? The last thing spencer should want to talk about is fraud.
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
