Replies to post #10301 on General Stock Ideas

[XenaLives]

For pete's sake he didn't mention any legal background - he dissed a judge for his family heritage and his gene pool!

[gfp927z]

SC, Looking at some of the really big issues and risks -


WW-3 -- Thinking about who would be more likely to get us into WW-3, Trump could stumble into one without even trying due to his out of control personality and inability to back down, while Hillary would only do it if she was told to by her handlers.


Police State -- Looking at who would more likely put us into a police state, again Trump gets the booby prize. Can you really round up and deport 12 million people without completely trashing the rule of law/due process? There would by necessity be midnight roundups, holding camps, breaking up families, so sounds a lot like 1930s Germany.


Constitution/Rule of Law -- Trump said he would officially sanction torture 'way beyond waterboarding', killing of the families of 'terrorists', and said he longed for the days when political protestors would be 'carried out on a stretcher'. And this guy gets support from some Libertarians?


2nd Amendment -- Looking at who is more likely to take away our gun rights, the Donald has recently backtracked and is exploring a range of 'compromises' with the NRA. Hillary is far more anti-gun, but would presumably face huge political opposition from the aroused Republicans who are desperate to retain their gun support wedge issue. If Hillary tries the executive order route, she'll get a lot more opposition than if a Trump tried it.


Economic/Financial Crisis - Trump's policies would have a much higher chance of triggering a crisis considering the extremely precarious state of things, as outlined by Jim Rickards and others. Rickards says things are so tenuous that it may just take a 'snowflake' event to trigger a financial avalanche, and with the Donald we're talking a torrent of protectionism, tariffs, trade sanctions, not to mention the uncertainly.


Assassination Risk -- Who is likely to be so out of control that the Deep State would be forced into really drastic measures? Again it's the Donald. People like Alex Jones support Trump ostensibly because they see him standing up to the NWO and giving them fits, but at this stage of the game if Trump did that effectively they would be forced to remove him.


So I'd have to conclude that Trump is the more dangerous of the two candidates.