Replies to post #41615 on Interactive Health Network (IGRW)

[lucky, mydog]

gail, for god's sake, why would anyone possibly want to scare you off?

[grantastic]

I also remember "some people" making claims that this stock would have current filings, was opening B&M dispensaries, was a 'waking giant' etc. at the same time.

It sounds like you're saying the entire world was only crediting negative posts on this single forum and ignoring all the positive posts.

The theory that some "team" on this forum is somehow able to halt the trading of this stock is not very believable. But even if it's true:

why would anyone do that?

[janice shell]

what i said was, just as it started to run and hit .0002's, "some people" came along to attack it and scare off others, happens all the time.

So what? There are differing opinions about nearly ever stock. This, however, wasn't even ABOUT the stock. It seems that a few--very few--jumped in without even taking the maximum five minutes required to understand why IGRW was Grey.

On the day in question--18 March--there were only 38 trades. Of those, only TWO were executed at 0.0002. That scarcely suggests large numbers of traders looking to buy, despite some fairly vigorous pumping going on behind the scenes.