You can't sue a stock symbol (SMAA), only the company that trades under the symbol. I sued the company S.M.A. Alliance and won a $1M+ judgment that is compounding interest.
The company signed a purchase agreement to buy the Cars.net assets. The company breached that agreement, and I was left with a web application and assets nobody would touch because the company (SMAA) had made a public claim of ownership. You say it's worthless, well it is now because of what SMAA did. Before SMAA agreed to buy the Cars.net assets, I had dozens of offers from $50k well into six-figures. It wasn't worthless when SMAA agreed to buy it. That's why I won the case, because the company (SMAA) caused me significant damages. Whether there's new management, or old, it doesn't matter, the company is liable for its actions.
Those are the facts, and to claim that I somehow scammed SMAA is rediculous on its face. I owned assets that they wanted to buy. SMAA came to me, I didn't approach them. A court found that SMAA breached, that I was damaged, and I won the lawsuit as a result. Now I'm collecting.
Those are the facts. Do you have some facts that contradict any part of what I'm saying?
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
