PROOF OF CONSPIRACY WE HAVE A CONFESSION
By: Alan Stang
This little piece is designed for use with the friends, neighbors and
colleagues you have been trying to awaken to what is going on in our
country.
These are the people to whom you report every advance of the conspiracy for
world government, hoping that the latest such revelation will be the one
that
finally opens their eyes.
But the only result you get is either the same glazed expression you
always see in their eyes, or the knowing remark that you have probably
misinterpreted what happened. Thus, you have recently gone to these
allegedly
"conservative" people with news about the super highway from Laredo to
Canada,
including the Mexican installation in Kansas City, which will bring Mexican
trucks and rail en masse across the Rio Grande.(I don't use the word
"border"
because the border no longer exists.)
Predictably, they told you that you are being alarmist. Did not Laura
Ingraham express amazement when a guest on her program accidentally
mentioned
it? She had never heard of it, or pretended she had not, in which case, how
could it be true? How likely is it that lawyer Laura doesn't know about this
latest demonstration that our country has been abolished? And notice that
she
knows about it now, but hasn't mentioned it again. The right wing Communist
media don't consider it an issue.
"If you could come up with proof, I would believe you," say these
people.
What proof would satisfy them? "A confession," they say. Friends, after all
these years, I have such a confession. It is breathtaking. There is no way
to
get around it; no possibility of "misinterpretation." If it fails to
convince
the people we are talking about, you can be sure they are either liars or
cowards or conspiratorial toadies themselves – or just have sewage for
brains –
and will deserve every wallop of the destruction that is coming. I am not
talking about people who are honestly ignorant, but about the belligerent
ignoramuses who argue with you in defense of Jorge Boosh and Beel Cleenton.
Why is it so necessary to understand that a conspiracy is at work? For
the
hundredth time, what do you do if I tell you that the country is falling
apart
because of a five-hundred year historical cycle, or because of sunspots, or
mistakes, or the law of probability, or for no reason at all, etc.? You
shrug
your shoulders, you sigh and you go home, because there is nothing you can
do
about sun spots or historical cycles, etc.
On the other hand, what do you do if I tell you that the country is
being
destroyed by specific men with faces, names, addresses and telephone
numbers,
who are conspiring to submerge you in a totalitarian socialist world
dictatorship they would run? Now you are galvanized. Now you wipe off the
cosmoline, saddle up and head for those addresses. So the first and most
important thing the conspiracy tries to do is keep you confused about its
existence.
Like me, you no doubt have received many internet messages that
contain
electrifying quotes. Many of these quotes are invented, made up, obviously
so
because they blatantly express what the inventor wishes the man whose mouth
he
puts them in would say. They are obviously phony because they are so
perfect,
because the man to whom they are attributed would never be so indiscreet as
to
say such a thing.
I won't give you any examples, because if I do they will predictably
be
sent to the farthest corners of the internet and I would be blamed for
spreading
them. You know some of the ones I mean. They usually arrive without a
source, so
one cannot look them up, but because they show up everywhere, they are
believed,
even without proof.
Recently, I have been receiving another such quotation. Because it is so
perfect, so classic, so blatant, I assumed it was a concoction and deleted
it.
By now I have received it in an email message four or five times, and this
one
does include a source. I decided to go to the source, sure I would find that
the
quotation was either nonexistent or garbled. Indeed, some such statements,
upon
inspection, turn out to say the opposite of what is alleged.
I found instead that this persistent statement was exactly as quoted, word
for
word and punctuation. It is one of the most breathtaking paragraphs I have
ever
read. It hit me like a thunderclap. At first, I was sure I had misread it. I
had
to reread it three or four times before I finally admitted to myself what it
said.
Meet David Rockefeller, of Standard Oil, Chase Manhattan and the Council on
Foreign Relations, which is one of the main headquarters of the conspiracy
for
world government. Random House published his Memoirs in 2002. I paid no
attention to it. What would he reveal? He certainly would not incriminate
himself, I thought. I was wrong. On page 405 of the paperback edition, David
Rockefeller says this:
"For more than a century ideological extremists at either end of the
political
spectrum have seized upon well-publicized incidents such as my encounter
with
Castro to attack the Rockefeller family for the inordinate influence they
claim
we wield over American political and economic institutions. Some even
believe we
are part of a secret cabal working against the best interests of the United
States, characterizing my family and me as 'internationalists' and of
conspiring
with others around the world to build a more integrated global political and
economic structure – one world, if you will. If that's the charge, I stand
guilty, and I am proud of it."
Please do as I did and get the book yourself. You don't need to buy it. Do
as I
did and get it from the library. Why would David Rockefeller say it? The
only
explanation I can think of is the Greek word hubris, the overweening pride
that
comes before a fall. There is also the in-your-face possibility that by now
Rockefeller is so close to his lifelong goal that he doesn't care what you
know.
For ease in understanding, let's list the charges he cites:
Inordinate influence over American political and economic institutions
Part of a secret cabal
Working against the best interests of the United States
Internationalism
Conspiring with others around the world
Building a more integrated global political and economic structure
David Rockefeller admits he is guilty of all this and, like all unregenerate
criminals, he is proud of it. What does "inordinate" mean? My dictionary
says it
means "not within proper limits; excessive." It also means "unrestrained in
conduct." In short, "inordinate influence" is wrong, but David confesses he
has
it. Remember that American voters did not authorize such influence.
Next he says he is "part of a secret cabal." "Cabal" is another word for
"conspiracy." A conspiracy includes three elements: secrecy, which he
admits,
two or more people and a goal that is evil. Indeed, what is the purpose of
the
conspiracy to which David belongs? He is "working against the best interests
of
the United States."
Please tell me what else you need to know. What more could you know? What
would
you call anyone else who is "working against the best interests of the
United
States?" Keep repeating that admission. Like the Communists and the Nazis,
he is
"working against the best interests of the United States." He agrees that he
is
"conspiring with others around the world."
For what? For "internationalism." David Rockefeller and his fellow
conspirators
are "building a more integrated global political and economic structure,"
which
in the context of his other admissions means they are conspiring to destroy
our
national independence and submerge us in a totalitarian socialist world
dictatorship they would run. David not only admits all this; he is proud of
it.
The quotation that began all this should be read by allegedly "conservative"
talk show hosts every hour on the air. Have you heard it even once? Have you
read it anywhere? Slimebags like Limbaugh will excoriate anyone who dares
call
in to suggest that someone could be doing bad things to America
deliberately,
when the proof of that suggestion is ready to hand.
Of course, this is easy to understand when you realize that the Rockefellers
themselves or their factotums sit on the boards of the companies that own
the
radio and television stations, the publishers, the newspapers, etc., to such
an
extent that the few mentions of such matters that do see the light of day
are
easily disregarded, right, Rush? That is why you never hear or read anything
about the real doings of the Rockefellers.
That is why you don't hear or read the truth in the "mainstream media" about
the
Rockefeller role in the Federal Reserve swindle and the income tax, or about
brother Nelson, for instance, who divorced his wife to marry someone else's
wife
and then died in still another woman's saddle. She got the Manhattan
townhouse
and $50,000, then a lot of money, to keep her trap shut, and she has.
If the Rockefeller confession does not convince the people you are trying to
convince, I suggest that you do with them what you do with the squishy,
stinky
dog turd you find on your shoe.
"Published originally at EtherZone.com : republication allowed with this
notice
and hyperlink intact."
----------------------------------------------------------
Alan Stang has been a network radio talk show host and was one of Mike
Wallace's
first writers. He was a senior writer for American Opinion magazine and has
lectured around the world for more than 30 years. He is also the author of
ten
books. Go to www.stangbooks.com to read about Alan Stang's blockbuster new
novel, He, about the greatest hero of all time, Jesus Christ.
If you would like him to address your group, please email what you have in
mind.
He is a regular columnist for Ether Zone.
Alan Stang can be reached at: feedback@stangbooks.com
We invite you to visit his website at: www.stangbooks.com
Published in the July 21, 2006 issue of Ether Zone.
Copyright © 1997 - 2006 Ether Zone.
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
