Oh boy, that? Where we learned no insiders actually sold a single share, because there were no SEC filings?
How can that be the basis of a theory that we can't acquire a new company due to insiders from prior acquisitions converting notes and then selling their shares?
That's such a obvious hatchet job article. If you think the company isn't going to continue to expand that's your opinion, and not a fact. You're opinion has been repeated to excess. Nobody takes that seriously.