Peregrine Management will probably release something to the fact that they now have a "EVEN better understanding of the MOA".
As for Sunrise, it failed, no matter what or how anyone on this board posts it. The trial did not meet it's primary objectives and management halted the trial and even went as far as thanking all participants.
Some here post non-public comments like "astronomical" and "data was better than what was released" as Factual and equivocal proof.
First, "astronomical" is subjective and the person who supposedly said it has taken the company to $0.40/share over the past decade. Since his tenure, shareholder value has declined. Maybe some of those who heard him say it, should have asked him to "clarify and quantify" that term. Doubt he would have been offended because most of what he says is shrouded in ambiguity.
Second, someone saying or acknowledging something behind closed doors in the back of the room of a conference has as much merit as some of the posters here... Absolutely none. If the data was better that what was released, then the P3 should have been a slam dunk since Management was "sandbagging".
Overall, it is comical that so many continue to believe that the current Peregrine management team has any idea of what they are doing. READ THEIR BIO's... ALL RELAY ONE MESSAGE --- NO RELEVANT PAST EXPERIENCE....
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
