News Focus
News Focus
icon url

Dr PeteRose MLB

03/31/16 11:21 AM

#191840 RE: wetscent #191838

A reasonable well thought out response. I think the board could use more like it.
icon url

Aqua

03/31/16 11:21 AM

#191841 RE: wetscent #191838

Agreed! I think after the FDA-approval, 90-cents is conservative for starters. We still have that 97-cents wall to knockout before we could start thinking about a higher PPS breakout. But with strong revenues and net profit gains, it would sure pack a punch to knock the wall down.

Cheers!
icon url

Couch

03/31/16 12:06 PM

#191852 RE: wetscent #191838

Well- I appreciate you laying out your thought process on the matter - certainly logic to it and able to follow the train of thought - we shall see - if Elite can run to .97 on no ADT opioid on the market - $2 on a run is quite possible. We shall see.
icon url

BostonTrader

03/31/16 12:49 PM

#191862 RE: wetscent #191838

The problem is that isn't how drug stocks work though in the currently painted scenario. Drug stocks move on approval not when the revenues actually come in, they trade on future prospects. The issue here is that if approval is a layup and revenues are sure to come, then people would be buying right now in droves. That is unless something else is making the buyers pause which is the case at the moment. Don't know what it is, but it's happening at the moment.
icon url

onco

03/31/16 12:55 PM

#191864 RE: wetscent #191838

Well said