Replies to post #447329 on Mr Cooper Group Inc fka COOP

[bkshadow]

"Schedules of Assets and Liabilities" don't...

...have $151 Billion (no, they are not off balance).

...or any other such assertion.

...they show "WMI" and "WMIIC" assets as required by the Bankruptcy Code after the Petition Date 'estimate.

...such corrects for the investment in WMB, bringing WMI's assets to 'just about what was resolved in the 7th Amended Plan.

...these filings should be read; they are the facts and not the asserted panacea's over the past 4 years.


Penalty for making a false statement or concealing property: Fine up to $500,000 or imprisonment for up to 5 years or both. 18 u.s.c 152 and 3571.


SCHEDULE OF ASSETS AND LIABILITIES FOR WASHINGTON MUTUAL, INC. (12/19/2008)
B6 Summary (Official Form 6 - Summary)

http://www.kccllc.net/wamu/document/0812229081219000000000011


SCHEDULE OF ASSETS AND LIABILITIES FOR WMI INVESTMENT CORP (12/19/2008)
B6 Summary (Official Form 6 - Summary)

http://www.kccllc.net/wamu/document/0812229081219000000000009


FIRST AMENDED SCHEDULE OF ASSETS AND LIABILITIES FOR WASHINGTON MUTUAL, INC. (1/27/2009)
B6 Summary (Official Form 6 - Summary)

http://www.kccllc.net/wamu/document/0812229090128000000000003


SECOND AMENDED SCHEDULE OF ASSETS AND LIABILITIES FOR WASHINGTON MUTUAL, INC. (2/24/2009)
B6 Summary (Official Form 6 - Summary)

http://www.kccllc.net/wamu/document/0812229090224000000000003

[bkshadow]

"Certain Assets" per the P&AA...

...are identified in it, especially, or at least.

...there are no $151 billion off balance referenced.

...but back to "certain assets."

....and the assertion that JPM just finally admitted it!

...ummmm, JPM's 2015 10K did not "change" the WMB transaction re: the purchase of "certain assets."

...let's consider taking a look at the "certain" language in the 9/25/2008 time period.

...ummmm, might want to take a look at the actual P&AA, specifically the following schedule:

...kinda 'sticks right out.

SCHEDULE 3.5 - Certain Assets Not Purchased





...or the assertion that JPM just now is changing their story.

...and they were hiding it (hold on) in the "Glossary of Terms" in the 2015 10K for the first time!

...and therefore, JPM only 'bought "certain" assets (i.e., so the hundreds of billions are now 'coming home).

...the JPM SEC filing is now reliable, but the JPM 10Ks showing the WMB assets purchased "can't be relied upon.?"

...as par for the course, it is brand new, never, ever previously revealed by JPM before!

...they are FINALLY ADMITTING IT.

...slight problem.

...2015 10K has it.

...2014 10K has it.

...2013 10K has it.

...2012 10K has it.



2015


...kinda 'sticks right out.





2014


...kinda 'sticks right out.





2013


...kinda 'sticks right out.




2012


...kinda 'sticks right out.




...just an observation.

[bkshadow]

When did the FDIC-R try to charge $150M fee...

...for the administration of the Washington Mutual Bank "receivership?"

fwh3334zeke Saturday, 02/13/16 10:49:46 AM
Re: fwh3334zeke post# 445999 Post #446001 of 446001 Go

If it is as you posted about the 151, the answer this WHY did FDIC-R try to charge a administrative fee of 150 million if it had already been used for something else????????????????????

...thanks for any link, other than a post that also doesn't contain such link.