Replies to post #77381 on GSDT Fintech Group Inc. (GSDT)

[SINCERELY2]

Great Pegaso. Thank you for the info.

[shotcallers]

Awesome, I will check back in 5 years.

[Insight1]

Takeaways:

1) Left not fired indicates the he thought it was going nowhere.
2) The lawsuit ended HOW long ago now? Check the date you wrote yourself that 100k check Sym.
3) Oh look, an unverifiable ownership stake in an unnamed company, how exciting.
4) Months of talk with nothing....why is he wasting his time?
5) It's not as large because you didn't roll your money into the company, but your own pockets.
6) They've said for ages they can't name bases, and then he just name drops three bases in the first post in over 6 months?
7) They've been talking about diversifying their revenue for over two years, still nothing. Just like those talks in DC.

I am less confident after reading this post than I was before reading it, and that is saying something.

The first formal statement of the yea and it was sloppy, contradictory to what they've said in the past, and contained no real information or update.

[louieforpar]

Here's the news..............

Here's the only update that is factual......period..


EVRM update.... As of 2/20/2016

New investors!!

Below is short list of promises,lies,overzelous comments by the company in the last six years that not one has come to fruition. Please refer to the i-box,twitter,and Facebook to view the following:

*No audit
*No shareholder monthly communication letter
*No task orders
*No updates on Guam/Mexico/GSS
*No tweets
*No update on lawsuit
*No contracts(see I-box)
*No iris installs anywhere to be found
*No Uplisting
*No news on overseas pleasure trips
*No news on Sym'ssss legal shelter services
*No word on the 80-100 million the company said it was worth
*No word on the 2006 Seaport contract
*No word on all the teaming agreements/partnerships(see I-box)
*Honeywell was in 2009 and not one dime since
*Seaport was in 2006 and not one dime since
*Patent is ten years old and not one install since
*The company is $600,000 poorer by way of ONLY getting $300,000
*The returned shares went direcly into sym'sssssss pocket
*No real proof the company is not a shell/front*No proof this company is any different than Sym'ssss previous *No business phones Perhaps the lawsuit has opened a much bigger can of worms in such the courts are looking into the true identity of all the members of EVRM,it's true intent and what could be perhaps...well,you get the picture.

[lukin4winners]

Thanks for postiing! Looks like some business associations (plural) in the works and shows the ceo is concerned about shareholders. With the L2 of EVRM being so thin on the ask surprised there aren't more venture capitalists buying it now at this low pps level. Looking very optimistic here.!