From the 8K -
The report of the Former Auditor on the Company’s financial statements for the fiscal year ended August 31, 2014 and 2013 did not contain an adverse opinion or a disclaimer of opinion, nor was either such report qualified or modified as to uncertainty, audit scope, or accounting principles, except that such reports contained an explanatory paragraph which raised substantial doubt on our ability to continue as a going concern.
During the fiscal year ended August 31, 2014 and 2013, and through the date of dismissal, (a) the Company had no disagreements with the Former Auditor... blah blah blah
On October 6, 2015, and effective September 30, 2015, the Company’s Board of Directors approved the engagement of D. Brooks and Associates CPA’s, P.A. (the “New Auditor”) as our independent registered public accounting firm, and the New Auditor was engaged on October 6, 2015, effective September 30, 2015. During the Company’s two most recent fiscal years and through October 6, 2015, neither the Company nor anyone on its behalf consulted the New Auditor regarding either (i) the application of accounting principles to a specified transaction, either completed or proposed, or the type of audit opinion that might be rendered on the Company’s consolidated financial statements, and no written report or oral advice was provided to us that the New Auditor concluded was an important factor considered by the Company in reaching a decision as to the accounting, auditing or financial reporting issue; or (ii) any matter that was the subject of a disagreement or reportable event as defined in Regulation S-K, Item 304(a)(1)(iv) and Item 304(a)(1)(v).
It does not say specifically in those words that they have to re-do the financials ... IMO it would be beneficial if they would or have engaged in doing so
Market Data 
Markets 
