Thank you, fireopal. But I think there's still an element missing, even beyond what panglozz added in response to your post. I wrote previously that I thought "...there were two Amendments to their Security Purchase Agreements, which both lowered the purchase price of their shares.
I didn't read the first Amendment. But the second Amendment did not apply to Officers and Directors of the company, so I assume that the first Amendment may not have applied to them, either."
I haven't been following this as closely as I would be following developments in SPNGQ. I guess that since I still haven't seen any charges filed directly related to KBIO, I don't consider Nasdaq's actions any more than just a regulatory sham, designed to keep money out of KBIO's coffers, and prevent the forward momentum of the company.
With that said, I still have not seen an 8K announcing the engagement of an auditor, and there is a 10Q and now a 10K that have to be completed. Why spend $20k per month on a consultant, if the filings aren't being addressed? Is there an insider interest in purchasing rights and assets in a fire sale from the bankruptcy court?