News Focus
News Focus
icon url

JamesGMS

01/17/16 6:44 PM

#249472 RE: volgoat #249471

Volgoat, LOL - Really : )

I assure you he is not writing the BLA.......



I assure you he IS writing the BLA.

Have you spoken with him? If not, perhaps you should make the effort. He's a nice guy and very approachable.

James
icon url

sulaco

01/17/16 7:51 PM

#249480 RE: volgoat #249471

Goat, we have predicted nothing on the Board


MSK? No chance. No one saw it coming, and no one here predicted it.

AZN? No chance. No one saw it coming, and no one here predicted it.

NCCN? No chance. No one saw it coming, and no one here predicted it.

See a trend?

Garnick clearly will have input into the BLA, but since it's a bear to put together, obviously he will guide the team who does it. That's what a seasoned supervisor does.

Your predictions have a certainly about them. They will all be WRONG.

Is Bavi Phase III a slam-dunk? Well, if you've lived long enough, you learn that nothing in life is a slam-dunk. But I like my odds. I like them even more now that MSK, AZN, and NCCN are on board. Clearly they see something you don't. Please, don't feel offended if I go with them.

Bears have pontificated here for years, brow-beating us for "external" validation for Bavi. "Only UTSW agrees, and they don't count." Well, when we get external validation of the MOA, when the number of literature citations continues to grow (1500+ papers), when researchers in other universities cite Bavi as a universal checkpoint inhibitor, when top-notch research labs want access to Bavi, what do we get? Well, more FUD.

I know the ol' Volgoat is in there somewhere. Hope to read him soon.

Regards,

Joe "Six-Pack"








icon url

asmarterwookie

01/17/16 10:28 PM

#249485 RE: volgoat #249471

Vol...buddy..trying to classify your assurances...is this assurance on the level of the first look in already happened or that the last 1-5 reverse split wouldn't happen?

I assure you he is not writing the BLA.......


TIA

wook