I don't think there's anyone who would argue otherwise...but the same could be said about any sector comprised almost entirely of penny stocks.
Suggesting that any penny stock is a viable investment (doing-so overtly or otherwise) is nothing short of naive (if not inexcusably irresponsible). And that's what has amazed me about the 420Investor service:
It may appear that the tendency we've witnessed - which could be interpreted by some as leading novice investors toward awful investments under the guise of expert analysis - brings about questions of ethics and morality or, at a minimum, whether the service is in fact conducted by a qualified expert - or just a phony.
So which is it that CANL investors should question in light of the 420Investor's long standing history of consistently poor "trade recommendations"?
Or - has the service's performance simply been the result of bad luck?
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
