unpathendhaunt, I agree with you but some do nt what us to believe that anything with PPHM is going to be set in motion soon.
Therefore suddenly we doubt Bavituximab, SUNRISE, the procedure PPHM will follow, the time it will take for results, the time needed to process them, the FDA approve them, etc, etc, etc.
And certainly we don't like clearly time-framed statements to be on time, such as start of SUNRISE before this year (2013, and we did start DEC 2013) or end of enrolment or unblinding because if those things are on time that PPHM statement that we could look at 2016 for PPHM PPS to appreciate would also suddenly have grounds f trued.
Hence it is better to mekker about dozens of collaboration that we don't see coming (well knowing PPHM would either not want or not be allowed to mention them) until suddenly they start to surface.
Or for Avid II not being up and running, well knowing that even if Avid is running production grade test batches within the stated time, it would take FAD inspections, reports and letter to have it cGMP approved before starting production.
In short anything is god to make us believe, now that PPHM is in hits BEST DOING EVER, that it all is going to take ages and hence some more before the PPS will start to move.
But just as a reminder, check XOMA and AVXL's 52wks low and highs and then see how fast it can go on the right news, not even the final events just the forward looking of it.
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
