Eeeeeeeven *IF* that's the way the 'tweet' reads, 'shanett' (under 'interpretive notions') - why wouldn't he mention anything about what his shareholders are LOOKING TO HEAR ABOUT???
Is this the old "Keep 'em talk'n..." theory being used?? Because: it's a very *tired* theory. As long as people are 'talking' about $LVGI, huh? Good...bad...indifferent - doesn't matter to "JF".
HE'S MADE HIS $1 SALARY! WHAT DOES HE CARE??? :-)
But in all seriousness, the guy IS NOT "CEO material". He used some couch-change to buy a racket (i.e. a dishonest scheme, trick, business, activity, etc.) from 'an old buddy of his' - as we've come to know.
Hey: I'm all for a person 'taking a shot' and making mistakes...as long as they 'admit' them, and do better!
...but this is almost starting to smell "criminal" now. I'm watching - very closely. As are "others"... ~ Maybe 'they' think 'The Law of Numbers' is on 'their' side?? I dunno...but it ain't! :-D
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
