News Focus
News Focus
icon url

fredmiller1999

10/22/15 1:24 PM

#439242 RE: tcr7309 #439237

how many times do we have to show you links and proof strait from por7 where all this is?

go back to our discussion a few months ago.

its is written in black and white who has all this.

the assets are being serviced by jpm

the TRANSFER OF ASSETS WAS NOT CONSIDERED A SALE

THE ASSETS WILL BE PAID FOR, USING BOOK VALUE

THE FDIC HAS AN OBLIGATION TO RECOVER MAXIMUM BOOK VALUE SO IT WAITED TO ASSESS THIS VALUE BY WAITING OUT THE RECESSION.
(all of this has been shown. dd was required of you to read what we post, so you will understand why were saying WHAT were saying.)

THOMAS GOULDING treasury director wrote all the notes in por7 explaining everything im telling you.

you either believe por7 was a hoax or you take it at face value.

but please stop asking the same questions over and over

the answers have been provided with links to prove this.

as you say you never seen such a thing before... my question to you is...

ok, you never seen jpm give up assets with out a fight til the end

have you ever seen jpm AGREE to give up all assets checks and payments
and then not give them up?

do you understand my question?

as you say you follow bankruptcys all the time.

you see them steal the money all the time... sure i get that.

but have you ever read a POR where jpm agreed it wasn't theirs and agree to give it back and the say... ummmmm nahhhh i think im going to keep it?

i believe this is where your dd is flawed

i believe youve never seen someone agree to giving assets back and further more agree that they DID NOT get substantially ALL the assets

THOMAS GOULDING wrote that in por7 and JPM agreed to it


have you ever seen an agreement like that?

my guess is nope....


another thing you have to include in your understanding is....

the fdic messed up big time

everyone knows they screwed up.

they are scrambling to figure out how to not pay us rico for the major mess up.

this is taking more time then usual.

if they dont then por7 will be used against them to prove a 2nd theft has occurred

dont forget... the bankruptcy is not over... so technically they have done nothing wrong until its finalized and closed.
why do you think the purchase and agreement has still never been finalized

if its revealed and finalized they are admitting to the theft.

they will figure out how to pay us or its jail time
icon url

wowalters

10/22/15 2:04 PM

#439248 RE: tcr7309 #439237

cr73 let's see if I can help you. Read all the Safe Harbor documents. Then ask yourself as CEO of a company, that is "legally isolating " assets. When would be the best time to repatriate the assets that are being shielded?
icon url

hotmeat

10/22/15 2:45 PM

#439250 RE: tcr7309 #439237

The assets are where they need to be, being serviced for continuity of operations by JPM. The lack of records could be as a result of these assets being off balance and untouchable by the Debtor and the FDIC-R/C. The following quote was sourced directly from the doc you posted.

Quote:"Under Statement 140, a transfer of financial assets to a trust or other legal entity that meets the definition of a Qualifying Special Purpose Entity ("QSPE") can be accorded off-balance sheet treatment by the transferor"

The last two questions are unfair since I nor anyone else here, except for the "professionals", are privy to such details.