InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

Desperado90

09/07/15 11:49 AM

#434578 RE: tcr7309 #434569

Here is the problem with this kinds of posts.

You provide very little depth of information but a lot of innuendos and false accusations against a law firm that consistently stated in court that there were $33Billion worth of assets at a minimum.

We have the slides for their closing arguments and they fought for the Rabbi trusts, they fought for the cash and they fought the debtors themselves which is not an easy feat in the Delaware BK system.

When Rosen, referred to the Judge in her first name I was shocked and from that day on I knew something wasn't right. There was no solvency analysis and there was no valuation analysis provided to the public.

Why do you think they sold us out?

In my day job, I do a lot of root cause analysis and the people that sold us out were the WMI BOD. They should have not only contested the receivership but immediately moved to have the books intact for a thorough forensic and financial analysis but you want to call Susman names because it would give you a warm cozy feeling.

You can't blame the guys in the backseat for how the drivers (debtors) drove the car.
icon url

2221

09/07/15 1:43 PM

#434582 RE: tcr7309 #434569

we are getting nothing as long as no one represent us right now without a lawyer and a class action we are getting nothing the clock is ticking and when that's over we are done we can talk on this board all what you want we are giving away our rights since no one act on behalf of us if you think represent a facts on this board will it change or alter the case outcome in our favor you are so wrong but if the same facts represented
in the court that's a different story I am a shareholder in this is a wake up call good luck to all of you