The blatant lying* in the hit piece is what is so appalling. Something written in that tone, with personal and "in my opinion" libelous personal attacks on people, posting pictures and addresses of people's private residences -- and then being obviously dead wrong on the science, and making flat statements that the drugs don't work and that the company is a "shell" -- these are things that never should have been allowed to be posted on a website that is "seeking credibility."
It does kind of make you go hmmm when you wonder why they posted it, doesn't it?
*truth is a defense in libel cases. I cannot imagine that someone could post the things that were written, sheerly from ignorance. One or two or a few statements, sure, but virtually everything?
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
