News Focus
News Focus
icon url

Spec29

06/10/06 2:20 PM

#59018 RE: LowFloatGoat #59010

"I know that Stockhocker and Spec29 are respected posters but it is starting to appear that they got caught without all their shares."

All I have ever done was add to my position. I'd be willing to make quiet the wager to prove it to anyone.

Would you care to accept? Anyone of the accusers care to step up and prove their mouth has not overrun their ass?


LFG, no offense to you, Sir!


icon url

TheDane

06/10/06 2:31 PM

#59020 RE: LowFloatGoat #59010

Can't stockhocker just be wrong about the e-mail without it having to be a conspiracy to bring the price of ERHC down? The freaking thing hit .38 last week; was it because stockhocker questioned the e-mail from WB?

I'd say there is the possibility that stockhocker is mistaken about the e-mail, but it's also possible it's an honest mistake. He just questioned the one from Art, anyway, not all of them, and he stated yesterday the one Mark posted appeared legit.

I do NOT see how these e-mails can be spoofed, but there's quite a bit going on in cyber-world that can't be explained by my philosophy.
icon url

Art2004

06/10/06 3:29 PM

#59022 RE: LowFloatGoat #59010

Yes, it's becoming more apparent that Stockhocker is the spoofer. When CEO Brandhuber is asked about all the Emails at a shareholders meeting and replies in the affirmative, all of Stockhockers posts on this topic will be forgotten...

Though I continue to prefer an update on the company website.