Can't stockhocker just be wrong about the e-mail without it having to be a conspiracy to bring the price of ERHC down? The freaking thing hit .38 last week; was it because stockhocker questioned the e-mail from WB?
I'd say there is the possibility that stockhocker is mistaken about the e-mail, but it's also possible it's an honest mistake. He just questioned the one from Art, anyway, not all of them, and he stated yesterday the one Mark posted appeared legit.
I do NOT see how these e-mails can be spoofed, but there's quite a bit going on in cyber-world that can't be explained by my philosophy.