I find it interesting that you came up with an average over 6 years to reach 30m per month. ..... yet when you apply that 6 year average (which would include "shares sold outside of market" that then came off restriction) you suggest this 90m over the last three months should not already account for "shares sold outside off market"
You are double counting. .... it's why nothing you offer in terms of "facts" (especially related to math) isn't taken seriously.