News Focus
News Focus
icon url

MONEYMADE

07/09/15 5:10 AM

#58915 RE: ttattletell #58913

DIVERTING FUNDS FROM CMGO/XA SINCE 2009!!!!!
icon url

MONEYMADE

07/09/15 5:11 AM

#58916 RE: ttattletell #58913

129. The crimes form a pattern of criminal acts lasting from 2009 through at least mid-
2014.

34
130. XA’s allegations of predicate crimes are established largely by the RICO
Defendants’ own words, in their own emails and text messages, and in their own spreadsheets
and fake bills, that they failed to irretrievably erase from XA’s server, which was restored, and
from Gudin’s I-phone, the only one left behind that was not completely erased.
131. They are, in addition, established, by Hudson Gray’s own website photos which
include photos of XA high-end furniture, stolen from XA’s office (the invoices for same were
recovered from XA’s server). This stolen furniture now adorns Hudson’s office, a fact
inadvertently documented on their own website.
The Three Criminal Enterprises and Enterprise Distinctness
132. The RICO Defendants operated and managed the affairs of four criminal
“enterprises,” with different but largely overlapping members.
133. The first criminal enterprise was and is Studio AG, a business entity enterprise
(the “Studio AG Enterprise), controlled largely but not exclusively by its owners Andereck,
Wilson, Day and Wagner. Studio AG was and is a criminal “enterprise” within the meaning of
18 U.S.C. § 1961(4).
134. The second criminal enterprise was and is Hudson Gray (the “Hudson Gray
Enterprise,” controlled largely but not exclusively by its owners, Andereck, Wilson, Wagner,
and, also, Lomma) (the “Hudson Gray Enterprise”). Hudson was and is a criminal “enterprise”
within the meaning of 18 U.S.C. § 1961(4) through which Andereck, Wilson, Wagner (and
Lomma) and that entity continued the pattern of predicate crimes which began at Studio AG, but
adding new predicate crimes, as indicated herein.
35
135. The third criminal enterprise was an association in fact enterprise within the
meaning of 18 U.S.C. § 1962(b), comprised of Studio AG, Hudson Gray, Andereck, Wagner,
Wilson, Lomma and Pizzo (the “Association Enterprise).
136. The fourth criminal enterprise was an association in fact enterprise among the
RICO Defendants to engage in the Diversions
137. Each of the RICO Defendants is a separate and distinct “person” within the
meaning of the RICO statute because each is either a natural person or business entity and, for
RICO purposes, this is sufficient distinctness between the entities Studio AG and Hudson Gray,
and the natural persons controlling enterprise activity, to satisfy RICO enterprise-person
distinctness.
138. Each RICO Defendant was and is a separate and distinct from the predicate
crimes of mail fraud and wire fraud and commercial bribery in which they engaged, because, on
information and belief, each had or has legitimate functions and activities, apart from their
criminal activities chronicled in Schedule A.
icon url

MONEYMADE

07/09/15 5:13 AM

#58917 RE: ttattletell #58913

How Each of the RICO Defendants Operated and Managed Enterprise Activity
139. Each criminal enterprise was operated for the common purpose of diverting
monies, property and clients away from XA, and concealing what was occurring, so clients

which would have, in the ordinary course, continued to use XA, for a reasonable period of time
going forward, would, instead, become a source of revenue for the RICO Defendants.
140. Each of the RICO Defendants satisfies the operation and management test, each
controlling a substantial part of the activity of the Enterprises, as follows.
141. Each RICO defendant operated or managed a portion of criminal enterprise
activity.
36
142. Andereck managed and operated the Enterprises in at least the following ways, as
alleged above and as set forth in further detail in Schedule A:
(a) causing XA to purchase goods and materials for the benefit of private
competing companies he secretly controlled with Wilson and Wagner, including, but not limited
to, Studio AG and Hudson Gray and, as well, XA Scenes;
(b) using XA employees to market and promote his own secretly owned and
controlled competing companies, XA Scenes, Studio AG and Hudson Gray, through direct
customer relations work, electronic communications and print marketing;
(c) directing XA employees to steal XA’s corporate property including
property necessary for the operation of its business;
(d) soliciting XA employees and clients to work with Hudson Gray, while
they were affiliated with and/or employed by XA;
(e) creating fraudulent American Express credit card statements on Excel
spreadsheets (with the American Express logo fraudulently superimposed on top) to disguise
actual purchases and fraudulently give the appearance that expenses on these spreadsheets were
billings from a single account, when, in fact, they reflected purchases from a number of different
American Express accounts, each and all of which were controlled by Andereck;
(g) directing defendants Lomma and Day to participate in the fraudulent
American Express scheme by creating their own fraudulent American Express statements;
(h) engaging in fraud through the purchase of lighting, furniture, drapery,
flooring, cabinets, rugs and other expensive decor items for use and sale to Studio AG
decorating clients which had no affiliation with XA, subsidizing their own competing enterprise;
37
(i) allowing employees Lomma and Day to purchase furnishings, electronic
equipment and clothing from high end retailers for Studio AG decorating clients (and their own
personal use) from merchants including, but not limited to, Brooks Brothers, Nordstrom, Best
Buy, The Container Store, The Brickell Collection, The Tie Bar, East Elm, All Modern, Zara,
Crate and Barrel, Restoration Hardware and other retailers selling goods and services, unrelated
to the operation of XA;
(j) directing XA COO Wilson to pay for legal services associated with
defendant Gudin’s fraudulent immigration application and was actively stealing property and
files from XA during the summer of 2014;
(k) Directing XA employees to stay away from XA’s own offices when
representatives of CMG, including XA’s new Chairman, Ron Burkhardt, came to XA’s office to
try to conceal the planned theft of XA’s property and business; such efforts at concealment
where organized and carried out by email and text message;
(l) Fraudulently re-purposing dormant XA subsidiary, XA Scenes, as a
marketing vehicle for defrauding XA via the Gallery 1028/Studio AG partnership, as alleged
above;
(m) fraudulently “closing” XA subsidiary Fiori XA to divert Fiori’s business
to Studio AG, a secret entity owned and operated by Wilson, Wagner and Andereck to directly
compete with and steal XA’s business;
(n) Using Studio AG to vend fictitious goods and services to XA that Studio
AG could never provide, were never delivered, and/or were double billed to mimic XA’s own
purchase orders as a method by which he and co- conspirators Wilson and Wagner could siphon
XA’s profits into their own enterprise;
38
(o) directing XA employees and executives to forge AG bills in an effort to
make it appear Studio AG bills were XA bills, so XA could subsidize Studio AG’s financial
burdens, draining XA’s financial resources.
143. Wagner managed and operated the Enterprises by inter alia:
(a) purchasing and/or causing others to purchase goods and materials for the
benefit of private competing enterprises he secretly controlled with Wilson and Andereck,
including but not limited to, XA Scenes, Studio AG and Hudson Gray, all using XA monies;
(b) using XA employees to market and promote his own secretly owned and
controlled competing companies, XA Scenes, Studio AG and Hudson Gray, through direct
customer relations work, electronic communications and print marketing;
(c) coordinating the Diversions including, on information and belief, engaging
in and/or directing others to engage in at least the following acts during the relevant time period,
(i) secretly creating Hudson Gray in March, 2014, six weeks before resigning as XA’s CEO and
signing a settlement agreement with XA, to facilitate the theft of approximately $1.5 million
dollars of XA contract work from NBCUniversal and other longtime XA clients and (ii)
fraudulently representing to CMG board members that he was unable to draw a full salary for his
services as CEO of XA for many years because of XA’s lack of profitability -- but secreting the
fact that the purported “lack of profitability” was orchestrated by himself and Andereck and
Wilson caused by their transfer of monies among their secretly owned companies;
(d) receiving $425,568.00 from CMG by virtue of a settlement agreement at
the time of his resignation on 4/30/ 2014 predicated on fraudulent representations and omitted
material information;
39
(e) erasing all his XA computer files and stealing hard copy files from XA’s
Chicago office, without CMG’s or XA’s consent, and directing XA employees leaving for
Hudson to do the same, many of which erased computer files have not been fully recovered;
(f) stealing or directing the theft of hard copy files including, e.g., files
containing those American Express bills expensed to XA in 2014 and all contracts and bills
related to XA’s past and ongoing business.
icon url

MONEYMADE

07/09/15 5:16 AM

#58918 RE: ttattletell #58913

"The Business Diversions – the NBCUniversal “Upfront”Event

83. The size of the business diversions was enormous. The “NBC Upfront” is an
event at which the networks unveil their fall lineups to advertisers and sell advertising space for
the upcoming season. It is the largest such event of the year and, generally, the most important
one in that industry. During 2015, NBCUniversal’s Upfront was held at the Jacob K. Javits
Convention Center in New York, on May 11, 2015.
84. XA recovered from its server the 2015 Upfront Budget, which breaks down what
XA the Hudson Defendants were charging NBCUniversal – namely, $16,530,000.00, as of
February, 2015. Subtracting costs for the venue and union labor paid for by NBCUniversal
(which the Budget indicates), at a minimum, the total event cost that Hudson Gray charged for
this NBC event is $14,530,000.00. The industry standard margin for event planners is twenty
percent – in other words, Hudson Gray and the Hudson Defendants will arrogate to themselves
almost $3,000,000.00 profit from this one job alone.




Super Attorney: Lawrence Steckman has more than twenty five years experience litigating securities, RICO and business cases. In July, 2006, Super Lawyers Magazine, in its first New York edition, identified Mr. Steckman as one of New York’s “Super Lawyers” in securities litigation and he received that honor again most recently in 2013, 2014, and 2015. Mr. Steckman has handled billions of dollars in client matters, has overseen the dismissal of billions of dollars in claims against his clients and has been counsel in leading securities, derivatives and RICO litigations as well as securities and commercial arbitration disputes. He is the author or lead co-author of more than forty published works on the law. The independent attorney rating service, AVVO, has awarded him a rating of “superb,” its highest level. - See more at: http://www.evw.com/attorney/lawrence-a-steckman/#sthash.14POgUu3.dpuf


TA UPDATE!!!!!!! 7/8 NO CHANGE.........



https://iapps.courts.state.ny.us/fbem/DocumentDisplayServlet?documentId=IUaJedm4kM7m9FCp9LpQxg==&system=prod
icon url

MONEYMADE

07/09/15 5:19 AM

#58919 RE: ttattletell #58913

WEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!!!! TO THE ABOVE NAMED DEFENDANTS:
YOU ARE HEREBY SUMMONED and required to serve upon Plaintiff’s
attorneys an answer to its First Amended Complaint in this action within TWENTY (20)
days after the service of this summons, exclusive of the day of service (or within
THIRTY (30) days after the service is complete if this summons is not personally
delivered to you within the State of New York), and in the case of your failure to appear
or answer, judgment will be taken against you by default for the relief demanded in the
First Amended Complaint
icon url

MONEYMADE

07/09/15 5:20 AM

#58920 RE: ttattletell #58913

"and in the case of your failure to appear
or answer, judgment will be taken against you by default for the relief demanded in the
First Amended Complaint"
icon url

MONEYMADE

07/09/15 5:24 AM

#58921 RE: ttattletell #58913

GEEEEEE DIVERTING FUNDS SINCE 2009, CREATING DUMMY COMPANIES AND BILLING XA ...THEN THEY HAVE THE BALLS TO DELETE EMAILS, TEXT AND HIDE RECORDS. NEARLY ALL RECOVERED FROM THE SERVER BTW!!!!!!

DID YOU SEE THE ONE ONE GUY WHO PAID FOR HIS WEDDING USING XA FUNDS??