News Focus
News Focus
icon url

parentsgratae

06/07/06 10:59 AM

#1988 RE: coinstarz #1987

doubtful; no motion for a continuance has been filed in connection with this motion; for a postponement "good cause" must be shown; this is still in the discovery process, but I cannot evaluate because I cannot read the motion.
icon url

zake1

06/07/06 11:07 AM

#1990 RE: coinstarz #1987

icon url

jellybean

06/07/06 11:24 AM

#1991 RE: coinstarz #1987

Moving the trial into 2007 is a very likely scenario.

The court actually stated in the recent "opinion" (denying Tercica's request to advance the trial date) that "the case is triple set and is not the oldest civil case set on November 6, 2006. Further, a criminal case could displace it. For a date certain, the parties should consider consenting to a magistrate judge to preside over the jury trial."