News Focus
News Focus
icon url

retired56sc

06/06/06 12:45 PM

#175913 RE: Stock Stallion #175912

legalegaltx: You think too much of yourself. Very dangerous.
icon url

gzfxfan

06/06/06 12:45 PM

#175914 RE: Stock Stallion #175912

hey smart guy, some of them have stated they will buy it back at lower prices
icon url

sddt

06/06/06 12:47 PM

#175916 RE: Stock Stallion #175912

yeah, I got out because I did not want to see another 5k dissapear...

I am still a sub and really enjoy the service (although, there are still quite a few movies that I cannot get through GnF that I think should be made available)

IMO, it will be a while before we see this move again. They have alot they need to work on.
icon url

Stocksquire

06/06/06 12:51 PM

#175922 RE: Stock Stallion #175912

happens all of the time and with every stock that has liquidity and a message board. no question about it.
icon url

Chicagostock

06/06/06 12:57 PM

#175925 RE: Stock Stallion #175912

I agree with Legal, you got a stock with outstanding shares in the 4 billions, "bashing" to try and get people to "sell to get the price lower to buy back in" wouldn't even make a dent in this and it would quickly rebound if there truly are BULLS in this stock. So the ones that would benefit would be the longs and the bulls because they can pick up shares for cheap.
So I highly doubt that anyone can truly shift the direction in this stock by bashing unless it is a negative FACT that comes out about the stock that causes people to get out.
The "people" waiting to get back in lower are doing exactly that, waiting. If it comes then it does if it doesn't then oh well.
fact is there is no buying interest or demand in this stock at this point and that is what's drawing it down, no bulls... to all the bulls on this board where are your horns start picking this up already...
JMO

icon url

bag8ger

06/06/06 1:36 PM

#175946 RE: Stock Stallion #175912

Balanced board:

From the other side, legal, yours makes me laugh because you think they aren't trying to get a lower pps.

Some aren't, and I appreciate their input.