News Focus
News Focus
icon url

end user

05/19/15 12:13 PM

#176437 RE: Rickless #176434

RE:he was the one who brought the challenge to HC.


Bill had to bring up a challenge because if he didn't then everyone would know right away it was his doing. Now he has an excuse to say oh look its HC and the courts faults for not giving us the license.


Funny how a CEO whose company is in major turmoil he is no where to be found and his last known location is Ukraine. LOL now that is a CEO that cares about being far enough where he can't be summoned to court.
icon url

Tiresias

05/19/15 12:34 PM

#176441 RE: Rickless #176434

don't need them in the board room, but insurance would dictate they would be required to make rounds inside the facility. All the security guard would have to do is confirm the grow op facility is compelted as Bill claimed. The challenge to HC is quite different from an investigation by the OSC. They are not even related in scope.