shtsqsh, how about .. "it was inevitable globalization would mean that the people of America (what is it? .. something like 6.5% of the world population with something like 65% of world wealth? .. check, OOPS, about 34% in 2006 just saw) .. anyway, that America would inevitably have to give back some of it's unsustainable share .. that understood,"
yes, actually you're right, in that i was looking at it from a world community perspective and actually thinking along the lines of this one of Stephanie's ..
and in this bit .. "it isn't right (what's that matter? well, it should) that the richest, [ the billionaires ], (in money terms) shouldn't pay back more of their own exorbitant, ungratefully .. [ i mean those that seem to be ungrateful, those of the Adelson and Koch Bros. ilk (and all those that enable them) judged by their attitude toward those who struggle to make ends meet .. i should have included, too ] .. possessed, so ungracious share (especially with much of it now earned in the absence of productive work) .. no, no envy at all here .. anyway it's also obvious that what is better for most doesn't matter to so many in our [the] last great (grate) most Christian nation of the world .." http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=113635046
on that how's that now? .. yup, more care required there .. lol, glad i didn't annoy you at all, though in .. http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=113637105 .. i felt that you were .. didn't think at all mine would cause you distress or embarrassment, either ..