OMG! You just don't get it do you! I read what Kras wrote and that is when I started my research which proved that Nulief is legal to sell and transport to all 50 states. I then contacted the company and stated that according to the law, hemp derived CBD obtained outside of the US is 100% legal, so why isn't the company moving forward to get Nulief to retail right now, since there is no legal issue holding them back? Here is the response I got back from Kras himself: "We have chosen a careful path to retail. Branding and controlled distribution first. From there we will leverage our key learnings and retail network as we put in place safeguards and protocols for marketing and sales."
Did he at anytime mention any legal reason preventing them from taking Nulief to retail? NO he did not!
Man oh man, how anyone can be so blind to what is right in front of him totally befuddles me! Frankly I am done discussing this issue with you, because you are so stuck on what you think after reading the comments Kras used to disguise the real reason the retail launch for Nulief will take so long. Unlike you, I didn't blindly fall for his bs, I went out and did some real research that revealed the truth.
If there was any legal issues the market wouldn't be swarming with so many hemp based CBD products, the DEA and/or FDA would have shut them done. The issue went in front of the federal courts where the following ruling was handed down and set a precedent that cleared the way for hemp based CBD obtained outside the US. That precedent made it very clear that it was legal and that no legal actions could be taken against any company selling or transporting hemp based CBD products in the US. Here is that ruling again:
Hemp products that have been imported through the proper means are exempt from the marihuana and THC laws in Schedule I of the DEA, as precedented in the 2004 Federal Ruling in favor of the Hemp Industry Association (HIA) vs. the DEA, in which Judge Betty Fletcher wrote, "They (DEA) cannot regulate naturally-occurring THC not contained within or derived from marijuana-i.e. non-psychoactive hemp is not included in Schedule I. The DEA has no authority to regulate drugs that are not scheduled, and it has not followed procedures required to schedule a substance. The DEA's definition of "THC" contravenes the unambiguously expressed intent of Congress in the CSA and cannot be upheld."
After all that you continue to ignore these facts, but hang your hat on what Kras said that I already addressed with him, whereas he stated the real reason was that they wanted to do additional test marketing and that they lack the resources to launch Nulief nationwide at retail. That was further confirmed by an email from Mr. James.
Your complete ignorance to all this is completely absurd and ridiculous, but hey if you want to make yourself look like a fool, who am I to try and stop you. Cheers!