News Focus
News Focus
icon url

lucky, mydog

04/11/15 8:30 AM

#90369 RE: dbowren #90368

lol. watch for that form 10 to be withdrawn.
icon url

skyrocketinsight

04/13/15 9:57 AM

#90371 RE: dbowren #90368

Everything goes back to the two recorded conversations of MIKP and FINRA. As soon as the form 10/audit were filed they (FINRA) would immediately satisfy the form 211.

Hard to believe that MIKP (Mark) could misinterpret what FINRA said twice.

Go MIKP!

icon url

LoveMyStocks2

07/19/15 2:38 PM

#90873 RE: dbowren #90368

AGAIN, THIS NEEDS TO BE REPOSTED.

I am a bit surprised people think FINRA won't approve the 211, a fully reporting company has nothing to hide from investors, has nothing to hide from FINRA, or the SEC. Meanwhile, 1,000 of companies are allowed to trade with limited or no information and people are thinking FINRA won't approve MIKP????? Time will tell, but I would personally be very upset at FINRA for not approving a fully reporting company, that is not in the best interest of shareholders. If they are worried about protecting new shareholders, there is no reason, as any potential new shareholder can review the fully reporting company before buying. That is why finra most likely told Mark, file a Form 10 if you want us to sign off on the 211, if not, tough luck. So, mark in the best interest of the shareholders and the company paid for an atty and an auditor to become fully reporting so that he could right the ship.

Why is this so hard for people to understand. Why are people pissed or upset that a pinksheet CEO actually did what FINRA instructed him to do? Another poster stated, Mark wouldn't chance not getting approved and still do an audit and Form 10 and I would likely agree with this poster, you would have to be NUTS to just take a shot in the dark without talking with Finra 1st and figuring out ahead of time, how to get the 211 approved.