News Focus
News Focus
icon url

fazlice

03/30/15 9:14 PM

#21222 RE: TeamTOC #21220

Yea i am re-running my numbers and no matter how i do them, they are still positive.

Please let us know about your calcs my friend,

E
icon url

Techamental Logic

03/30/15 9:39 PM

#21226 RE: TeamTOC #21220

Gut feeling based on unknowns...total guess but there is one thing I can make an educated guess on and that is that production costs for Namoya per ounce were likely around $1,100. I'm basing that on how Twangiza performed when it first started.

I don't know how much BAA had left of the $35.5M that Gramercy injected them with and I also don't know what the cost of work on Namoya was.

Banro released short, medium and long term plans for Namoya when they first disclosed the fine particle issue. However I couldn't discern how or if they were following any of them close enough to match up to their estimates. If I remember right the short term was $2M or a so and medium was $2M per month. Something like that.

The short term drum spilled over into Q1 so maybe there was no hit in Q4 for that. The PPS action seems odd for a company about to post both profit and a cash in the bank closing for funding.

Sooo...my gut is telling me that BAA may hit one more little speed bump here before it gets to takeoff speed. I should also mention that I've been long with BAA for quite a while now during which BAA has hit more speed bumps than I was expecting so that may have just jaded me.